powyzsze omawia ze niektore organizacje usilowaly wymusic rozumienie zapisow cites w ktorych polowanie z gatunkami nie wymienionymi w załaczniku II (prawie to samo co aneks B) do dyrektywy 338/97 (czy tej ktora reguluje uzywanie zoltych citesow na terenie UE) miałoby być zakzane co oznaczaloby koniec sokolnictwa z gatunkami z aneksu A (zalacznika I)HUNTING OF SPECIES NOT LISTED IN ANNEX II OF THE BIRDS DIRECTIVE
Some strict protection organisations have been claiming that Article 9(1)(c) of the Birds Directive can only be used for species listed in its Annex II/A and, for the relevant Member States, in its Annex II/B. These statements were seemingly being taken into consideration by DG ENV of the European Commission. In order to avoid wrong interpretations and make the position of FACE clear, President Gilbert de Turckheim addressed a letter to Director General for Environment, Stephen Leiner. In his reply (available to the Members upon request), Mr. Leiner indicates that “The Commission shares your view that in principle Article 9(1)(c) can also be applied to species that are not listed in Annex II”, and he insists on the strict conditions that must be met in order to apply the derogation.
(...)
The Commission’s report on derogations in 2008 provides many practical examples of the use of Article 9(1)(c) for species not listed in Annex II (see in particular Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK).
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ ... t_2008.pdf
nie tylko u nas ekofioly szaleja
Moderator: JoHn DuMbaR
nie tylko u nas ekofioly szaleja
tu macie przyklad ze cos na kształt "niech żyją" usiłuję sie forsować nawet na szczeblu europejskim.
-
- stażysta
- Posty: 114
- Rejestracja: ndz mar 28, 2010 6:20 pm
- Lokalizacja: pomorze